Understanding how different sectors behave across market cycles is critical for evaluating shifts in risk appetite and portfolio positioning. Equity sectors are commonly grouped into growth, cyclical, and defensive categories based on their earnings profiles and sensitivity to macroeconomic conditions. Analyzing the relative performance between these groups provides insight into whether markets are favoring risk-taking or stability at a given point in time.
Beginners Series Webinar: Join us on Monday, May 18th at 2 PM (ET) for our NDW Beginners Series Webinar. This week's topic is: Understanding Relative Strength (RS) & the Matrix Register Here
Understanding how different sectors behave across market cycles is critical for evaluating shifts in risk appetite and portfolio positioning. Equity sectors are commonly grouped into growth, cyclical, and defensive categories based on their earnings profiles and sensitivity to macroeconomic conditions. Analyzing the relative performance between these groups provides insight into whether markets are favoring risk-taking or stability at a given point in time.
Growth sectors are those expected to outpace the broader market, typically driven by secular trends and characterized by higher valuations and sensitivity to interest rates. Cyclical sectors are closely tied to the business cycle, with earnings rising during economic expansions and falling in downturns. Defensive sectors, by contrast, generate stable earnings regardless of economic conditions, as demand for their products and services tends to remain steady even in recessionary environments.
In this analysis, growth and cyclical sectors are grouped together and evaluated relative to defensive sectors using SPDR sector ETFs as proxies. The growth/cyclical basket includes Communication Services (XLC), Consumer Discretionary (XLY), Financials (XLF), Industrials (XLI), Materials (XLB), and Technology (XLK). The defensive basket consists of Consumer Staples (XLP), Health Care (XLV), and Utilities (XLU). Energy and Real Estate are excluded from the analysis due to their less consistent classification across these frameworks. This exclusion helps maintain a cleaner comparison between pro-cyclical and defensive exposures.
The chart above illustrates the rolling one-year performance spread between growth/cyclical sectors and defensive sectors. The red line represents the long-term historical average spread between the two groups. Recent market dynamics show a meaningful resurgence in growth and cyclical leadership, with the spread widening to approximately 20%. This move highlights a sharp rebound in higher-beta and economically sensitive areas of the market, signaling a shift toward a more risk-on environment.
After consolidating clustered signals into distinct observations, there have been approximately 17 instances where the rolling one-year spread exceeded the 20% threshold. The table above summarizes forward returns for each growth/cyclical sector across multiple time horizons following these occurrences. While returns are positive across all time frames, the most notable strength emerges in the intermediate term. Average forward returns reach approximately 4.10% over three months and 8.11% over six months across the group. This consistency across sectors reinforces the persistence of momentum, where strong relative performance tends to carry forward over subsequent periods.
Overall, the analysis suggests that periods of extreme outperformance by growth and cyclical sectors relative to defensives are not only indicative of a risk-on backdrop but are also associated with continued strength in the months that follow. This reinforces the importance of momentum as a factor and highlights how sector leadership trends can provide actionable signals for tactical asset allocation.
