Market Concentration: It Cuts Both Ways
Published: June 10, 2026
This content is for informational purposes only. This should not be construed as solicitation. The general public should consult their financial advisor for additional information related to investment decisions.
Market concentration is a sword that cuts both ways. So far in June, the S&P 500 ([SPX]) is down 2.57% while the S&P 500 Equal Weight ([SPXEWI]) is up 0.16%.

Market concentration is a sword that cuts both ways. So far in June, the S&P 500 (SPX) is down 2.57% while the S&P 500 Equal Weight (SPXEWI) is up 0.16%. Over the same time frame, the average performance of the top ten weighted stocks in the S&P 500 is -6.88% while the average performance for the rest of the S&P 500 is 0.52%. The voracious move lower in the largest stocks has changed the short-term relative strength picture between SPX and SPXEWI to favor the equal weight representative, as we mentioned in a piece on Monday (click here for more). Nonetheless, we still see the cap-weight maintain its long-term relative strength and has been on a buy signal versus SPXEWI on its 1% RS chart since May 2023. Back to performance from the start of June, while the performance contribution to the S&P 500’s return from other than the top 10 stocks is just 0.01%, just over 60% of those stocks are positive so far in June.

The bifurcation between the mega caps and the rest of the S&P 500 can be seen through the action of the Ten Week for the S&P 500 (^TWSPX) indicator. ^TWSPX was up by over 10% yesterday, while SPX was down 86 basis points. Said plainly, 10% more stocks in the S&P 500 moved above their 50-day moving averages while the index itself was down almost 1%. Undoubtedly, the level of concentration at the top of the index is having an impact on market behavior. Furthermore, the days when the SPX was down more than -0.25% and ^TWSPX up more than 5% have mostly occurred this decade, with history going back to 2001. This bifurcation hasn’t been an issue for markets, the one-year forward return for the SPX following such occurrences was positive except the one in March 2001. However, looking at three month forward returns, there’s been the potential for volatility in both directions. We saw this happen in January last year before the tariff tantrum and in July 2018 before a rough fall for the market over the next six months. However, it’s usually been good more often than bad, as seen in the table below. Overall, increasing market concentration makes the index susceptible to diverge from the rest of the market. 

Back to report

DISCLOSURE

This report is for Internal Use Only and not for distribution to the public. While we make every effort to be free of errors in this report, it contains data obtained from other sources. We believe these sources to be reliable, but we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Investors who use options should read the Options Disclosure Document before making any particular investment decision. Officers or employees of this firm may now or in the future have a position in the stocks mentioned in this report. Dorsey, Wright is a Registered Investment Advisor with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. Copies of Form ADV Part II are available upon request.
Equity prices provided by Thomson-Reuters. Cross Rate prices provided by Tenfore Systems. Option prices provided by OPRA
Copyright © 1995-2026 Dorsey, Wright & Associates, LLC.®
All quotes displayed are delayed 20 minutes
Disclaimer/Terms of Use/Copyright