Daily Summary
Metal Mania: Basic Materials Review
Basic Materials has quietly been the most improved sector in DALI since the start of the year, but only a few areas within it present favorable pictures.
NDW Prospecting: Problems in Passive Fixed Income
Active management has enjoyed an advantage in fixed income with remarkable consistency
Weekly Video
07/30/2025
Weekly rundown with NDW analyst team covering all major asset classes.
Weekly rundown with NDW analyst team covering all major asset classes.
Beginners Series Webinar: Join us on Friday, August 8st at 2 PM (ET) for our NDW Beginners Series Webinar. The week's topic is: Idea Generation with Stocks and Funds. Register Here
Basic Materials has quietly been the most improved sector since the start of the year, gaining 61 signals in DALI, which is 36 more than the next closest sector (Energy). The group has seen a similar rise within Asset Class Group Scores, as it has increased its average fund score by 1.58 points, which is the largest increase among the 11 major sectors. Basic Materials is the most sensitive sector to changes in the US Dollar (DX/Y), as we highlighted in our US Dollar Study, so the greenback’s 10.7% drop in the first half of the year served as a tailwind for the space. However, with the dollar picking up slightly since then, the Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLB) has fallen 3.3% over the last month while returning to a sell signal.
Despite the sector’s pickup in strength this year, it also has yet to break into firmly overweight territory, as the group ranks 6th in DALI while holding a below acceptable score of 2.99 in ACGS. Looking at XLB, things look even worse for the sector, with a fund score of 1.37 that has yet to move above 2.0 this year. Given that the sector has improved so much, how can a broader representative still be so weak?
While the sector has undeniably picked up relative strength, the increase has not come from all areas of the sector. Basic Materials are largely buoyed by the strength of metal-related companies while other areas of the sector have faltered. One way of evaluating the strength of subsectors is through the NDW Group Matrix, which ranks 40 groups in addition to the Equal Weight S&P 500 (SPXEWI). The three largest risers within the matrix since the start of the year are the Precious Metals, Non Ferrous Metals, and Steel groups. Precious and Non Ferrous metals have moved to the first and fourth matrix rank, respectively, while Steel is at 20th. Meanwhile, other areas within the sector have been a drag, with Forestry and Chemicals ranking bottom three in the matrix while both are down on the year. So, if you’re going own Basic Materials exposure, your best bet is is to focus on metal companies.
Gold miners have been one of the brightest areas this year, helped by the almost 30% gain in gold (GC/) YTD. The VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is having its strongest year ever, with its near 70% YTD gain being its best since the index’s inception in 1993. Over the last week, the fund rose another 11% and completed its third consecutive market RS buy signal. GDS also holds a near perfect fund score of 5.80, in addition to a positive score direction of 1.48, highlighting its strength so far this year. Recent movement has left the fund near extended positioning, so those looking to add could wait for some consolidation or pullback around $55 to $51.
Last week, we discussed active vs passive management and reviewed the performance of both management styles across various asset classes over both the short- and long-term. Which management style (active or passive) is superior in any given asset class can change over time, however, active has enjoyed an advantage in fixed income with remarkable consistency. In addition to its tendency to underperform active strategies, there are multiple other issues with passive fixed income.
Performance
Perhaps most important to most investors is the issue of performance. As we have reviewed passive vs active management over the years, we have found a few consistent themes. One is that the S&P 500 (SPX) has been a very difficult benchmark for active managers to beat over the last 10 – 15 years. Another is that, out of all the markets we’ve examined, US fixed income has been the most favorable to active management as the US Aggregate Bond Index (LBUSTRUU) consistently ranks near the bottom of the US core fixed income universe, meaning that investors who have chosen an AGG-tracking fund over an actively managed strategy have almost certainly sacrificed performance.
Your Exposure Can Materially Change Without You Doing Anything.
Unlike the major equity indices, which usually have stable constituencies from year to year, the composition of bond indices changes much more frequently. Whereas the S&P 500 and the Russell 1000 (RUI) are updated quarterly and annually, respectively, the composition of the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Index changes monthly. The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG), for instance, had a turnover of 81% for the 12-month period ending February 28, 2025; meanwhile, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) had a turnover of just 3% over the same period.
Why should the average investor care about the more frequent rebalances and higher turnover of fixed income indices? With roughly 7% of the holdings in the Aggregate Bond ETF changing every month on average, the exposure in the fixed income portion of a portfolio can change quickly and it can happen under the surface, i.e., without an advisor or client seeing any trades in the portfolio. While this is often viewed as a primary benefit of the ETF product structure, it may not be as advantageous if you don’t understand what the impact of those changes is. Unless they are looking at the exposure breakdown of the index every month, an investor could find that the exposure in the indexed bond ETF they bought six months ago looks very different than the exposure it brings to the portfolio today.
The “Bums” Problem
The changing nature of fixed income indices we discussed above also contributes to the “bums” problem. As with equity indices, many fixed income indices are essentially market cap weighted. In equity indices, market cap weighting means that the most historically successful companies (at least in terms of increasing their market value) become the most heavily weighted. In a fixed income index, however, the most heavily weighted entities are those that have issued the most debt. This presents a problem for the buyer of a cap-weighted fixed income index, as they will be most heavily exposed to the most debt-laden and not necessarily the most creditworthy of issuers. Apple (AAPL) maintained an enviable credit rating for many years but only had its first bond issuance in 2013. As such, AAPL couldn’t have been included within investment grade or AGG-tracking bond funds before that time.
Furthermore, unlike equity indices which typically include only corporations, issuers within fixed income indices can include corporations, states and municipalities, and sovereign governments. Heavily indebted sovereign governments present a unique challenge as they can (and at various points have) simply decide to cease payments on their notes, leaving debtholders with limited recourse.
The “bums” problem can be mitigated by utilizing another weighting schema, e.g., equal weighting, but this can introduce new problems, such as a heavier weighting toward thinly traded, illiquid issues. And so, many bond funds employ some form of market cap weighting, and the impacts of this are quite different than we find within the US equity category.
Passive Bond Indexes Can Become Riskier at the Worst Time.
You’re undoubtedly aware that prior to 2022 we had been in an ultra-low interest rate environment for many years and a declining rate environment for far longer still. That trend has shifted, but among the effects of the years of low-interest rates is that the bond market itself became riskier. Since 2009, the duration of the US AGG Index has increased from around 3.5 years to around six years. For the bond aficionados out there, this suggests that a 1% rise in yields today would cause a corresponding decline in bond valuations of about 2.5% more than a similar rate move back in 2009. This is caused, again, by passive bond portfolios investing in a market that hasn’t itself remained “passive”. As the chart below shows, the duration (or rate sensitivity) of the Agg peaked in 2021, when interest rates were near multi-year lows. So, while investors were taking on more risk, they were also receiving lower yields.
Although the duration risk of the AGG has improved moderately in the last couple of years as higher interest rates have pushed coupons higher and made long-term debt less attractive, the core market remains significantly more sensitive to rate movements than it was prior to the financial crisis and this shift in risk happened under the surface of AGG-tracking funds. While there are additions and deletions to equity indexes, if you own SPY you probably have a pretty good idea of what your exposure is, even if you haven’t recently reviewed a holdings list. However, in the case of a passive fixed income fund, the exposure could have materially shifted since you added it to client's portfolio.
Developing a Plan
In our estimation, a market like fixed income - where active management has a record of outperformance and the exposure of passive funds can change under the surface – is an ideal environment for a tactical approach. Currently the fixed income rankings in the Asset Class Group Scores favor exposure to non-core areas of the fixed income market like convertibles, high yield, and international bonds. But this is not a static situation. As we discussed in yesterday’s report, the market is now pricing in a strong probability that the Fed will resume cutting interest rates next month, which could be beneficial for the rate-sensitive core market. Tactical strategies will attempt to navigate these potential shifts by allocating toward strength in the market.
Tactical fixed income strategies are available both as separately managed accounts and guided models. If you would like to discuss tactical managed account solutions please contact Andy Hyer at AndyH@dorseymm.com or (626)535-0630.
If you are interested in implementing a guided model we have several options available on the platform including:
The First Trust Fixed Income Model (FTFIXINC.TR)
The iShares Fixed Income Model (ISHRFIXED.TR)
The NDW Tactical + Ladders Fixed Income Model (LADDERS.TR)
Each of these models are rules-based, relative strength methodologies capable of providing rotation within the fixed income asset class. Each model employs a unique investment inventory that dictates both the boundaries by which it may concentrate exposure and the markets it may utilize. Collectively, they offer solutions for fixed income sleeves within a larger portfolio or can be part of a core-satellite strategy that uses low-cost indexing as well.
Average Level
27.72
< - -100 | -100 - -80 | -80 - -60 | -60 - -40 | -40 - -20 | -20 - 0 | 0 - 20 | 20 - 40 | 40 - 60 | 60 - 80 | 80 - 100 | 100 - > |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
< - -100 | -100 - -80 | -80 - -60 | -60 - -40 | -40 - -20 | -20 - 0 | 0 - 20 | 20 - 40 | 40 - 60 | 60 - 80 | 80 - 100 | 100 - > |
AGG | iShares US Core Bond ETF |
USO | United States Oil Fund |
DIA | SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF |
DVY | iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend Index ETF |
DX/Y | NYCE U.S.Dollar Index Spot |
EFA | iShares MSCI EAFE ETF |
FXE | Invesco CurrencyShares Euro Trust |
GLD | SPDR Gold Trust |
GSG | iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust |
HYG | iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF |
ICF | iShares Cohen & Steers Realty ETF |
IEF | iShares Barclays 7-10 Yr. Tres. Bond ETF |
LQD | iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corp. Bond ETF |
IJH | iShares S&P 400 MidCap Index Fund |
ONEQ | Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index Track |
QQQ | Invesco QQQ Trust |
RSP | Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF |
IWM | iShares Russell 2000 Index ETF |
SHY | iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Tres. Bond ETF |
IJR | iShares S&P 600 SmallCap Index Fund |
SPY | SPDR S&P 500 Index ETF Trust |
TLT | iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF |
GCC | WisdomTree Continuous Commodity Index Fund |
VOOG | Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF |
VOOV | Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF |
EEM | iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF |
XLG | Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF |
Long Ideas
Symbol | Company | Sector | Current Price | Action Price | Target | Stop | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLLI | Ollies Bargain Outlet Holding Inc. | Retailing | $140.80 | 120s | 150 | 102 | 5 for 5'er, top 25% of favored RETA sector matrix, LT pos mkt RS, buy on pullback, Earn. 8/28 |
DRI | Darden Restaurants, Inc. | Restaurants | $205.15 | hi 190s - mid 210s | 262 | 178 | 5 TA rating, top 50% of REST sector matrix, LT RS buy, consec buy signals, buy-on-pullback |
DG | Dollar General Corp. | Retailing | $113.32 | 100s to mid 110s | 133 | 86 | 4 TA rating, top 33% of RETA sector matrix, LT peer RS buy, consec buy signals, buy-on-pullback, Earn. 8/28 |
BSX | Boston Scientific Corporation | Healthcare | $102.95 | 99 - 108 | 133 | 91 | 5 for 5'er, top 25% of HEAL sector matrix, LT pos mkt RS, spread triple top |
TSCO | Tractor Supply Company | Retailing | $60.25 | upper 50s | 66 | 50 | 3 for 5'er, top half of favored RETA sector matrix, LT pos mkt RS, buy on pullback |
HLT | Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc | Leisure | $260.95 | 260s - low 280s | 364 | 216 | 5 TA rating, top 50% of LEIS sector matrix, LT RS buy, LT pos trend, consec buy signals, buy on pullback. |
RPM | RPM, Inc. | Chemicals | $119.75 | 110 - 120 | 150 | 99 | 5 for 5'er, top half of favored CHEM sector matrix, LT pos mkt RS, bullish catapult, pos trend flip, 1.7% yield |
VEEV | Veeva Systems Inc. | Healthcare | $282.65 | 274-lo 300s | 348 | 232 | 5 TA rating, top 10% of HEAL sector matrix, recent shakeout, buy-on-pullback, Earn. 8/27 |
AMZN | Amazon.com Inc. | Retailing | $222.31 | 200s - low 210s | 240 | 178 | 4 for 5'er, top half of favored RETA sector matrix, LT pos peer & mkt RS, buy on pullback |
SCHW | The Charles Schwab Corporation | Wall Street | $96.71 | lo-hi 90s | 120 | 76 | 5 TA rating, top 20% of WALL sector matrix, LT peer RS buy, consec buy signals, buy-on-pullback |
WING | Wingstop Inc. | Restaurants | $335.95 | 320s - 340s | 432 | 280 | 5 for 5'er, #3 of 28 in REST sector matrix, LT pos mkt RS, buy on pullback |
AXP | American Express Company | Finance | $295.54 | 288-lo 310s | 424 | 236 | 5 TA rating, top 20% of FINA sector matrix, LT RS buy, LT pos trend, consec buy signals, buy on pullback |
Short Ideas
Symbol | Company | Sector | Current Price | Action Price | Target | Stop | Notes |
---|
Follow-Up Comments
Comment | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDW Spotlight Stock
AXP American Express Company ($294.35) R - Finance - AXP has a 5 for 5 TA rating and sits in the top quintile of the favored finance sector RS matrix. We have also seen the stock maintain a positive trend since 2023 and sit on an RS buy signal since 2022. The stock rallied to a new all-time high in July after giving two consecutive buy signals. Since then, AXP has seen consolidated price action that leaves the stock in a more actionable range. Exposure may be considered from $288 to the low $310s. Our initial stop will be positioned at $236, which would violate multiple support levels. The bullish price objective of $424 will serve as our upside target.
25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
328.00 | X | 328.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
324.00 | X | 7 | O | 324.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
320.00 | X | O | X | O | 320.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
316.00 | X | O | X | O | 316.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
312.00 | X | O | X | O | 312.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
308.00 | X | 2 | X | O | 308.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
304.00 | X | X | X | O | X | O | Mid | 304.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
300.00 | X | O | X | O | X | O | X | 6 | X | O | 300.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
296.00 | X | X | O | X | O | X | O | X | O | X | O | X | 8 | 296.00 | |||||||||||||||
292.00 | X | O | X | C | X | 1 | O | X | O | X | O | X | O | 292.00 | |||||||||||||||
288.00 | X | O | X | O | 3 | X | O | X | O | 288.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
284.00 | X | X | O | O | X | O | 284.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
280.00 | X | O | B | O | X | X | 280.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
276.00 | A | O | X | O | X | O | X | X | 276.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
272.00 | X | O | X | O | X | O | 4 | O | 5 | 272.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
268.00 | X | O | O | X | O | X | O | X | 268.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
264.00 | X | O | X | O | X | O | X | X | Bot | 264.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
260.00 | X | X | O | X | O | O | X | O | X | X | 260.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
256.00 | X | O | X | O | O | X | O | X | O | X | 256.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
252.00 | X | O | X | O | X | O | X | O | X | 252.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
248.00 | X | 9 | X | O | X | O | X | O | X | 248.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
244.00 | X | O | O | X | O | X | O | X | 244.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
240.00 | X | O | X | O | O | 240.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
236.00 | X | O | X | 236.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
232.00 | X | O | X | • | 232.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
228.00 | X | O | X | • | 228.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
224.00 | O | • | 224.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 |
AAPL Apple Inc. ($220.03) - Computers - AAPL rose Thursday to give a third consecutive buy signal at $220. This 3 for 5'er moved back to a positive trend in July, showing a consistent series of higher lows since April. The weight of the technical evidence is mixed but improving. Initial support can be seen at $204 with further support seen at $196 and $194. |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. ($183.15) - Semiconductors - AMAT returned to a buy signal Thursday with a double top break at $184 before reaching $186 intraday. This 4 for 5'er moved to a positive trend in May and has maintained an RS buy signal against the market since 2023. The weight of the technical evidence is favorable and improving again. Initial support is seen at $176 with further support at $166. Overhead resistance can be seen at $192. Note that earnings are expected on 8/14. |
APP AppLovin Corp. Class A ($437.05) - Software - APP moved higher Thursday after the company's earnings release, breaking a triple top at $400 before rising over 11% intraday to $448. This also caused the stock to reverse back into a column of Xs against the market, promoting it to a 5 for 5 TA rating. The weight of the technical evidence is strong and improving. Initial support can be seen at $380 with further support at $368. Overhead resistance can be seen at the all-time highs of $512-520. |
ATO Atmos Energy Corp ($164.49) - Gas Utilities - ATO broke a double top at $162 for a second buy signal as shares rallied to $166, matching the all-time chart high. The stock is a 4 for 5'er that ranks within the top third of the Gas Utilities sector matrix and is accompanied by a yield of 2.2%. Okay to consider on a pullback to $160 on the chart. Initial support lies at $150, while additional can be found in the lower $140s. |
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. ($49.90) - Food Beverages/Soap - Shares of CELH broke a double top at $49 after reporting earnings. Today’s move saw the stock return to a positive trend for the first time in over a year, bringing it up to a perfect 5 for 5’er. Those looking to add exposure could consider doing so here or closer to the middle of the trading band around $45. |
CHRD Chord Energy Corp. ($99.81) - Oil - CHRD fell to a sell signal Thursday when it broke a double bottom at $100. Thursday's move adds to an already weak technical picture as CHRD is a 1 for 5'er that ranks in the bottom half of the oil sector matrix. From here, the next level of support on CHRD's chart sits at $97. |
DUOL Duolingo, Inc. Class A ($391.56) - Business Products - Shares of DUOL skyrocketed on strong earnings, ending its streak of six consecutive sell signals after breaking a triple top at $360. Today’s move also returned the stock to a positive trend, bringing it back into acceptable territory. Traditional support for the fund lies at $336 and $332, but previous resistance in the $380 to $356 range could also serve as future support as well. |
FLUT Flutter Entertainment Plc ($306.29) - Gaming - FLUT revesed into Xs and broke a double top at $312 for a third buy signal and to mark a new all-time high. The stock improved to a 5 for 5'er after reversing back into Xs on the market RS chart during July's trading. This action places the stock in overbought territory so those seeking expsoure will look for a pullback to $300. Initial support lies at $296, while additional can be found at $264. |
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. Class A ($109.92) - Wall Street - HOOD shares moved higher today to break a double top at $110 to mark its first buy signal and continued higher to reach a new all-time high. This 5 for 5'er has been in a positive trend since April and on an RS buy signal versus the market since February 2024. HOOD shares are trading near the top of their trading band in heavily overbought territory. From here, support is offered at $94. |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company ($644.59) - Drugs - LLY moved down further, completing a bearish catapult at $728 and marking its second consecutive sell signal. The 1 for 5'er shifted down from a 2 after exhibiting long term relative weakness against the market. Additionally, the stock ranks in the bottom half of the drugs sector matrix. The weekly OBOS indicates that the stock is in oversold territory, so wait for the 10-week trading band to normalize before selling position. Long exposure should be avoided. Initial resistance is at $768, with additional resistance at $816. |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. ($55.95) - Chemicals - NTR fell to a sell signal Thursday when it broke a triple bottom at $57. The technical outlook for the stock remains marginally positive as NTR is a 3 for 5'er that ranks in the top half of the chemicals sector matrix. From here, the next level of support on NTR's chart sits at $54, while its bullish support line now sits at $53. |
RL Ralph Lauren ($281.29) - Textiles/Apparel - RL reversed into Os and broke a double bottom at $284 to initiate a shakeout pattern as shares fell to $276. The stock is a 5 for 5'er that ranks within the top quintile of the Textiles/Apparel sector matrix. The action point for the shakeout pattern would be upon a reversal into Xs at $288, while the pattern would be complete upon a triple top break at $308. Initial support lies at $260. |
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. ($92.23) - Transports/Non Air - UER advanced today, returning to a PNF buy signal in the process. The stock remains a strong attribute stock at the time of this writing, and the upside move confirms some support just below the middle of the trading band between $86 & $87. Holders are fine to continue to do so, and those looking to take satellite positions should feel comfortable entering here. |
USFD US Foods Holding Corp. ($80.13) - Food Beverages/Soap - Shares of USFD broke a double bottom at $81 to move to a sell signal. However, a reversal back into a column of Xs would initiate the start of a shakeout patter, which would be a bullish pattern for the stock. USFD also remains a 5 for 5’er and is back to trading in actionable territory. From here, support lies at $76 while previous resistance in the low $70s could serve as future bounce points as well. |
V Visa Inc. ($332.05) - Finance - V shares moved lower today to break a double bottom at $332 to mark its third consecutive sell signal. This 5 for 5'er has been in a positive trend since October 2022 and on an RS buy signal versus the market since November 2012. V shares are trading below the middle of their ten-week trading band with a weekly overbought/oversold reading of -36%. From here, support is offered at $320 and $316. |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation ($105.95) - Oil - XOM fell to a sell signal Thursday when it broke a double bottom at $106, where it now sits against its bullish support line. The weight of the evidence remains moderately positive as XOM is a 3 for 5'er that ranks in the top half of the oil sector matrix. Beyond the bullish support line, the next level of support sits at $102. |
Daily Option Ideas for August 7, 2025
New Recommendations
Name | Option Symbol | Action | Stop Loss |
---|---|---|---|
Etsy Inc - $59.78 | ETSY2521K60 | Buy the November 60.00 calls at 6.80 | 55.00 |
Follow Ups
Name | Option | Action |
---|---|---|
Philip Morris International Inc. ( PM) | Nov. 160.00 Calls | Raise the option stop loss to 12.50 (CP: 14.50) |
Apple Inc. ( AAPL) | Oct. 200.00 Calls | Raise the option stop loss to 22.35 (CP: 24.35) |
Amazon.com Inc. ( AMZN) | Oct. 210.00 Calls | Raise the option stop loss to 17.50 (CP: 19.50) |
New Recommendations
Name | Option Symbol | Action | Stop Loss |
---|---|---|---|
Paypal Holdings Inc - $68.12 | PYPL2521W67.5 | Buy the November 67.50 puts at 4.15 | 75.00 |
Follow Up
Name | Option | Action |
---|---|---|
The Clorox Company ( CLX) | Oct. 125.00 Puts | Stopped at 4.40 (CP: 4.30) |
Novo Nordisk A/S (Denmark) ADR ( NVO) | Sep. 65.00 Puts | Stopped at 18.00 (CP: 16.70) |
Robert Half Inc. ( RHI) | Sep. 40.00 Puts | Raise the option stop loss to 4.20 (CP: 6.20) |
Salesforce Inc. ( CRM) | Nov. 260.00 Puts | Raise the option stop loss to 25.85 (CP: 27.85) |
New Recommendations
Name | Option Sym. | Call to Sell | Call Price | Investment for 500 Shares | Annual Called Rtn. | Annual Static Rtn. | Downside Protection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robinhood Markets, Inc. Class A $ 105.65 | HOOD2521K110 | Nov. 110.00 | 15.90 | $ 47,639.10 | 49.23% | 52.92% | 13.32% |
Still Recommended
Name | Action |
---|---|
Hims & Hers Health Inc. ( HIMS) - 51.13 | Sell the September 55.00 Calls. |
IonQ Inc. ( IONQ) - 41.23 | Sell the October 42.00 Calls. |
MARA Holdings Inc. ( MARA) - 15.89 | Sell the December 18.00 Calls. |
General Motors ( GM) - 52.47 | Sell the December 55.00 Calls. |
NetApp, Inc. ( NTAP) - 103.33 | Sell the December 110.00 Calls. |
Micron Technology, Inc. ( MU) - 108.78 | Sell the November 110.00 Calls. |
KKR & Co. L.P ( KKR) - 144.56 | Sell the October 145.00 Calls. |
Dollar General Corp. ( DG) - 113.32 | Sell the November 115.00 Calls. |
Apollo Global Management Inc. ( APO) - 145.87 | Sell the December 150.00 Calls. |
Vertiv Holdings LLC ( VRT) - 139.75 | Sell the October 140.00 Calls. |
The Following Covered Write are no longer recommended
Name | Covered Write |
---|---|
|