Franklin ETFs Score Update
Published: August 7, 2025
This content is for informational purposes only. This should not be construed as solicitation. The general public should consult their financial advisor for additional information related to investment decisions.

This section of the report categorizes select Franklin ETFs by their respective broad group. Along with each group, you can view the Average Group Score, which is an average of the scores of all funds represented in that particular group. Those Franklin ETFs that meet or exceed the Average Group Score will be highlighted in green in order to easily view those ETFs that have superior strength within their respective group. You want to focus on those ETFs that exhibit superior strength when looking to add new exposure to a particular group.

 

 

Large Cap Funds Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 4.2 FLQL Franklin US Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF 5.56
UDIV Franklin US Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF 4.59
USPX Franklin US Equity Index ETF 4.50
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF 4.19
Global Funds Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 3.9 FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF 5.77
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF 5.51
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF 5.34
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF 4.89
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF 4.83
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF 4.73
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia Ex Japan ETF 4.63
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF 4.41
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF 4.37
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF 4.16
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF 4.04
FLEE Franklin FTSE Europe ETF 3.83
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF 3.21
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF 3.07
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF 2.67
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF 2.57
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF 2.32
Mid Cap Funds Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 3.7 FLQM Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF 3.83
Global Fixed Income Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 3.4 FLIA Franklin International Aggregate Bond ETF 2.62
High Yield Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 3.1 FLHY Franklin High Yield Corporate ETF 3.08
Corporate Bonds Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 3.0 FLCO Franklin Investment Grade Corporate ETF 1.98
Small Cap Funds Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 2.9 FLQS Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF 1.26
Broad Fixed Income Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 2.6 FLBL Franklin Senior Loan ETF 0.93
Treasury Bonds Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 2.4 FTSD Franklin Short Duration US Government ETF 1.44
Municipal Bonds Symbol Name Score
Average Group Score: 2.1 FLMI Franklin Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF 1.11
FLMB Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF 0.20

 

Back to report

DISCLOSURE

Franklin Templeton Distributors has arranged with Dorsey Wright to provide this specialized ETF model which holds the Franklin LibertyShares ETFs. The Point & Figure analysis, models and resulting rankings, including any information, data or commentary included therein, are created and provided solely by Dorsey, Wright & Associates. Such analysis, models and rankings should not be considered an offer to purchase or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or purchase any security, including Franklin LibertyShares ETF shares. Neither Franklin Templeton Distributors nor Dorsey Wright through this ETF page provide investment advice or recommendations regarding any security, fund or market. The percentage of the portfolio devoted to any ETF is at the sole discretion of the financial advisor or the customer, and not Dorsey, Wright & Associates or Franklin Templeton Distributors. If you are not familiar with the Point & Figure methodology, we suggest you read “Point & Figure Charting, 4th Edition” by Thomas J. Dorsey. If you are not familiar with the Franklin LibertyShares ETF product, or Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), we suggest you visit www.libertyshares.com. The relative strength strategy is NOT a guarantee. There may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value. Relative strength is not predictive and there is no assurance that forecasts based on relative strength can be relied upon.